Dental Health issues: Electromagnetic Pollution?
Posted On: Feb 20, 2024 17:21:01 GMT
via mobile
ellesardragon likes this
Post by Leon Grad on Feb 20, 2024 17:21:01 GMT
So I've been working since my late teen years so it's been a whole lots of years now. I had all my adult teeth by the moment I started working, and that was in a rural area. I'd eat lots of sugar, drink lots of soft drinks, and to be honest I didn't brush my teeth that much. Yet I had no issues with my teeth. At all.
I and started working in one of the local big cities we have here in Quebec and that's when I began to literally lose chunks of my teeth, and random teeth. I completely stopped all sugars, I stopped eating desserts (I only eat food as naturally as possible with less processing as possible), I cleaned my teeth very regularly, and the decay was somewhat slowed down. I did end up losing two teeth by then (completely disintegrated by themselves).
Next job took me out of the big city, into a less-dense city. The decay was almost paused, but was still very slowly occuring. I kept reading that this was because of bacteria so I kept drinking stuff to kill bacteria, including mint, tea and even clove.
Next job, I kept the same diet and hygiene, and suddenly I start losing new chunks again. New teeth are once again just dissolving like sand, tiny bits by tiny bits, at random places. This time, there's large power lines and an electric grid distribution plant near the place.
Could it be that the large 60 Hertz electromagnetic pollution associated with high-tension AC power lines is actually somehow correlating with tooth decay? As if to confirm this, the employee that had worked for the longest there (but not the oldest by age) has lost like half of his teeth by now. Yet employees that are older than him, but have worked for less time there, have much better teeth.
I really really recommend we investigate electromagnetic pollution from alternating current power grid, and launch serious (and this time unbiased) studies on its use. This pollution might not just be a poison to humans, but also to surrounding wildlife.
AC was adopted in the middle of the 20th century because it allowed for a central power plant to send electricity further through power lines. But at that time the effects on living beings and on animal cells were not studied. By 1980-1990, studies came out, warning of serious risks of increased cancer, immune diseases, and childbirth issues. This applied to humans but also to animals in the wilderness that were exposed to this electromagnetic pollution. These studies were opposed by electricity corporations, which then continued building more powerful power plants and larger power lines.
Today we live in a world with ever-increasing cancer rates, increased immune diseases, and increased issues affecting health really. Pangaea should really consider suspending the use of powerful AC, until we can figure what the heck is going on. Until then I really suggest the adoption of smaller, decentralized power plants (possibly home generation) that generate DC (which emits no electromagnetic pollution). Solar panels are a good example of DC power, which is also the kind of electricity that comes out of a common battery. Converting some of that DC into AC (to power devices that run on AC) would indeed generate associated electromagnetic radiation, but the overall strength of this radiation would be much smaller and so this method would have a much smaller EM-pollution footprint on both humans and wildlife.
I and started working in one of the local big cities we have here in Quebec and that's when I began to literally lose chunks of my teeth, and random teeth. I completely stopped all sugars, I stopped eating desserts (I only eat food as naturally as possible with less processing as possible), I cleaned my teeth very regularly, and the decay was somewhat slowed down. I did end up losing two teeth by then (completely disintegrated by themselves).
Next job took me out of the big city, into a less-dense city. The decay was almost paused, but was still very slowly occuring. I kept reading that this was because of bacteria so I kept drinking stuff to kill bacteria, including mint, tea and even clove.
Next job, I kept the same diet and hygiene, and suddenly I start losing new chunks again. New teeth are once again just dissolving like sand, tiny bits by tiny bits, at random places. This time, there's large power lines and an electric grid distribution plant near the place.
Could it be that the large 60 Hertz electromagnetic pollution associated with high-tension AC power lines is actually somehow correlating with tooth decay? As if to confirm this, the employee that had worked for the longest there (but not the oldest by age) has lost like half of his teeth by now. Yet employees that are older than him, but have worked for less time there, have much better teeth.
I really really recommend we investigate electromagnetic pollution from alternating current power grid, and launch serious (and this time unbiased) studies on its use. This pollution might not just be a poison to humans, but also to surrounding wildlife.
AC was adopted in the middle of the 20th century because it allowed for a central power plant to send electricity further through power lines. But at that time the effects on living beings and on animal cells were not studied. By 1980-1990, studies came out, warning of serious risks of increased cancer, immune diseases, and childbirth issues. This applied to humans but also to animals in the wilderness that were exposed to this electromagnetic pollution. These studies were opposed by electricity corporations, which then continued building more powerful power plants and larger power lines.
Today we live in a world with ever-increasing cancer rates, increased immune diseases, and increased issues affecting health really. Pangaea should really consider suspending the use of powerful AC, until we can figure what the heck is going on. Until then I really suggest the adoption of smaller, decentralized power plants (possibly home generation) that generate DC (which emits no electromagnetic pollution). Solar panels are a good example of DC power, which is also the kind of electricity that comes out of a common battery. Converting some of that DC into AC (to power devices that run on AC) would indeed generate associated electromagnetic radiation, but the overall strength of this radiation would be much smaller and so this method would have a much smaller EM-pollution footprint on both humans and wildlife.