|
Post by Leon Grad on Nov 10, 2023 18:20:33 GMT
With all that talk about gasoline that has great performance but causes greenhouse gases, then electric vehicles that have equally great performance but they are on toxic/explosive materials that aren't that super eco-friendly to mine, basically we have to realize that the western world relies a whole lot on China to manufacture stuff for them, like batteries and solar panels, so the western world can claim to be "eco-friendly" while all they're really doing is delegating the pollution over to China and then blame China for the pollution. But that doesn't need to be the case for Pangaea. I remember when the Apaloosa was being designed there were talks about making it run on compressed air. The idea is not totally crazy. pangapedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Compressed_air_carAccording to the article right now it's possible to make a car run for over 100 km, at the efficiency of a lithium battery car, but all that with air instead of gasoline or electricity. Even more interesting is the fact that to compress air you just need a source of mechanical movement, not gasoline or electricity. It could be a windmill, a waterwheel, or even a compression-by-depth concept where you drop a canister at the bottom of a profound sea, let water compress the air, then retrieve the canister now full of compressed air. A canister has a much longer lifespan than a battery, it can be discharged for an unlimited amount of cycles. Plus, compressed air engines can be made super silent, and have no associated electromagnetic pollution (proven to increase cancer rates in both humans and wildlife). Could Pangaea's industry become a leading pioneer in compressed air technology, solving both the issue of greenhouse gases AND dependency on China?
|
|
|
Post by ellesardragon on Nov 12, 2023 0:39:40 GMT
that might work indeed. but what kinds of volumes and pressures did they use? to make it work well however we would need to make it work like a clockwork, as in that it won't release to fast early on and to slow later on, lucklily letting air out of a high pressure tank causes cold and eventually freezng, but this also means a liquid would then be send out and that would waste energy. so we would need to either design and use a chamber which uses surrounding or tank heat to turn liquid air into gas like some kind of fuell explosion but constant and slower. or we would need to slow down the speed to keep the temps high enough or add in a heater.
also I think I just might have a idea involving some basic modern rocket science which despite fanboys claiming it to be hightech and very new, it in reality is around 100 year old or such, the inventor who used it just kind of treated it like something simple and logically anyone should expect to happen so didn't describe it to much seeing it more like basic physics(also turned out to be a invention people didn't use since they didn't understand how it worked(tesla turbine)) the tesla turbine (not to be confused with the current car company) actually is a insanely efficient and insanely simple and stable and small engine, kind of the perfect engine. the engine has already been designed originally with aerospikes in it(now deemed to be recent innovations in rocketscience by many), as a funny extra the aerospike in that engine where actually more advanced than the ones in current day space engines. one of the very interesting things about it is the self regulating/adapting/programmable aerospike parameters, you don't need to have a fixed design early on but you can change it in a analog way while it is running without any extra parts basically only depending on the rotation speed and centrifugal force.
what that means in simple words is that the faster such a turbine will spin the smaller it will make the nozzle formed by the aerospike, note that there is no physical nozzle, the nozzle is created out of air while it runs. (when I first realized this/figured this out and managed to prove it with a physical prototype I seemed to be the firt person after nikola tesla who actually realized this.). but it means we can limit the flow of air making it more efficient, also if nothing is done it will kind of autobalance itself. it still will go faster with higher pressure but it prevents it from shooting the tank empty at once.
also some years ago I had designed a special part for using such a engine properly in a car or plane or such, as well as 2 other parts and one other system implementation based on existing parts. these engines will be much cheaper and simpler to make and maintain as they can be practically maintainance free other than the bearings perhaps but there is only 1 moving part and that is just a axis with some disks on it meaning no vibration or such, which also allows to make the vehicles a lot more leightweight. recently I also just happened to find a new part for it, even though if we are going to run it on pressurized air that won't be needed anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Leon Grad on Nov 12, 2023 21:16:51 GMT
Yeah I've actually been considering lots of different air engines designs over the last years, and of course the Tesla turbine came to my mind.
Problem is that is offer insanely high speed. But very little torque. The thing is, if the rotor is prevented from turning (say, the wheels of the car encounter an obstacle or resistance), the compressed air can just flow between the discs in the engine, and come out. So the engine isn't powerful enough to overcome the resistance, and air is just wasted out while the car wheels don't turn any longer.
But I have a better design.
|
|