|
|
Post by Leon Grad on Jul 19, 2023 17:10:46 GMT
A team of the Federation of Pangaea has discovered strong evidence in favor of over-unity, which until now was considered impossible.
The discovery came in the form of a test in which the output of one form of energy seemed superior to the input of the same energy form. According to know physics this was assumed to be impossible.
Further testing are being conducted to investigate the discovery and determine if it truly consists of over-unity.
|
|
|
|
Post by ellesardragon on Jul 19, 2023 19:18:24 GMT
very nice and cool, I know this is a sensitive topic around the world. so great to see people talk about it anyway. since to reach something new sometimes it is just needed to go for it even if not knowing if you will succeed or not, or when the odds seem to be completely against it.
I wonder what was found and who where involved. also is there any publications already as of this moment to see what the things are, or is it still in a more secret or early state.
I also have worked on something like it, essentially by using a big contradiction in science, due to which it is actually scientiffically seen correct and should work. and if it doesn't that means some of the most fundamental parts of physics are completely wrong. ofcource for both outcomes I already have a solution.
but I wonder what kind of device or method this is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leon Grad on Jul 25, 2023 13:25:26 GMT
Preliminary tests seem to indicate output exceeding input
|
|
|
|
Post by Leon Grad on Jul 28, 2023 16:41:35 GMT
Further testings allowed us to use part of the output energy to power the machine itself. The objective is to build a self-sustaining generator. Although we could only harvest parts of the output, and the machine is not configured in an optimal generating configuration, results were staggering.
The control test indicated that the machine should normally consume 0.30 Volt from an AA battery in 15 seconds, which translates to 0.02 V/s. But when we harvested some of the output to power the machine, the total battery consumption dropped to only 0.00016 V/s (0.01 V/min).
This has groundbreaking implications, such as the creation of Pangaean engines that are 12,500% more energy-efficient.
|
|
|
|
Post by athamanatha on Sept 13, 2023 23:43:13 GMT
Perpetual motion machines are not very likely, to put it mildly. You have to essentially test them in a completely external-energy-sourceless location, to be sure they are not receiving energy input from the environment - be that from light, wind, gravity, heat...
It's not a simple matter to get the maths right either. And extraordinary claims would require extraordinary proof to be taken seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leon Grad on Sept 14, 2023 16:30:33 GMT
Yep. In addition, over-unity (capacity of something to produce, for a moment in time, more energy than it receives) isn't necessary equivalent with perpetual motion, which would require the object to run forever (every moment of time since it's built).
|
|
|
|
Post by ellesardragon on Sept 20, 2023 8:32:05 GMT
well aren't most perpetual motion devices and designs just meant to find a new source of energy?
for example solar panels would have been considered perpetual motion devices before they became widely accepted.
a device which converts gravity into energy without needing to be raised or wound up by external forces other than gravity and the device itself would also be considered perpetual motion right now.
since if with perpetual motion it really only talks about energy without any "reason" then the only perpetual motion in some way would be existence itself, even though it can be debated existence itself is more like a inter-dimensional infinite infinite(so with infinite infinities of infinite size) crystal like thing.
the device I mentioned actually attempts to transform "passive" gravity energy into "active" energy by using a 4 dimensional geometric movement shape(the device itself is a 4 dimensional device yet you can "easily" build it in 3d where easily is for people who can actually build things properly, but it is just a mechanic machine that uses a relative deformation in the relative perception between space and Time to generate energy.
didn't test the device however and didn't even try to test it.
since the main reason behind designing that device was to get people thinking since I actually used widely accepted physics in the exact way most schools teach it these days and most people believe it to work like to argument it's working.
so it is way more interesting if people themselves find out if it works or not since if it works the science they believed in and based many things on, or atleast how it is teached these days and how people see it is incorrect and if it works the same is true since then it means it is a working "perpetual motion device".
I did actually kind of do a shallow publishing of it but kept it shallow on purpose.
but it's general working is just a Time geometric change mashine.
while I can't easily build a device like it at home without it having insane amounts of friction and energy loss(lego and 3d printed parts and a small device also is less efficient than a big one).
I did actually test the exact opposite of the device so using a Time geometric device to turn active into "passive" energy that is actually also where the concept came from since if you bike up a mountain at a low speed it will eventually cost more energy to get to the top of the mountain than at a somewhat higher speed when biking because next to the speed you are also constantly going against gravity which tries to pull you down so backwards, and since that factor doesn't change the optimal efficiency for the total climb is actually reached at a speciffic speed.(note this is for good athletes who can actually handle the force and speed well, me and my father tend to be really good in the mountains)
also note this device isn't the device ark talked about. while I do know some things about arks device I don't know all about it and it isn't mine to talk about.
|
|
